Last week, my wife and I were watching on a NHK broadcast satellite channel an extremely engrossing documentary about what America is doing to whistle blowers. It’s called Silenced (2014). It was about three very intelligent and patriotic people who worked for the CIA, NSA and U.S. Justice Department respectively. One whistle blower revealed and spoke out against U.S. military’s water-boarding. The NSA whistle blower, on the other hand, blew the whistle on NSA surveillance practices on American citizens before Edward Snowden. In the middle of watching, at about 9:35 p.m., a phone call interrupted us. My wife answered and it was the Yomiuri Shimbun‘s political pollster. A live woman, not a machine. The poll was basically about prime minister Abe’s various policies. The woman’s job was to give multiple choice questions. For example, “Should a reduced sales tax rate be applied to: 1) only the perishables; 2) both perishables and processed foods?” My wife answered, “Who in the world wants any tax on the food we eat anyway?” The pollster woman answered, “So, it’s more like choice 2 then.” My wife said, “Is it?” Then the woman said, “I’ll put your answer down as #2.”
The results of the poll were printed on December 6. Sixty-one percent of the respondents chose #2, which was much higher than the 21% that answered #1. The paper said that 55% was in favor of applying reduced rates to items outside foods, while 33% was against. Fifty-eight percent was for the introduction of reduced rates, while 31% was against the idea. My wife was never asked these last two questions.
This was the first time she was bestowed the honor of being a randomly chosen respondent. We had known by watching public opinion poll results on TV that there had to be a certain amount of bull shit in the way the questions are conceived, but my wife’s experience proves that these polls can be quite deceptive.
We went back to watching Silenced, and found that America’s mainstream media bashed the three whistle blowers, making them look like criminals. One of them was sent to prison.
In the last 5 years, about ten people from different parts of the world contacted me with questions about mostly dead musicians with whom I used to play decades ago. Most of them said that they were writing biographies about those musicians. Some of these people turned out to be professors or editors of magazines. What strikes me is that they either have a very low level of investigative skills or are too busy sending a query from their i-phones to check out my website before contacting me. One of them said to me after I answered his questions, “What instrument do you play? Guitar?” I kindly sent back to him a link to my website and told him to find out himself.
These would-be authors come to me because they have some information, probably from unreliable online sources, that needs to be verified. They usually don’t explain who they are in detail, reasons why they are bothering me with their questions, or if I’ll get a copy of the book if it’s ever published. They certainly have no intention of paying me for taking time to answer their meaningless questions. I can’t help but feel sorry for the people who pay to buy their books. I’m sure they are not getting their money’s worth.
We all have to watch out for inaccurate information that looks like the truth. The world is full of it.